UTS leadership coach Beyond Excellence
ABC's Four Corners has revealed that the University of Technology Sydney paid a leadership coaching firm $1,487,461 — including $783,000 in 2024 while planning to cut 340 jobs and more than 1,000 subjects — as part of a sector-wide investigation exposing Australian universities' $1.8 billion consultant spending bill in 2024, the same year that a no-confidence motion in UTS's vice-chancellor passed with 95% support. MDRX/CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=107930563

When the University of Technology Sydney announced it would cut 340 jobs and more than 1,000 subjects — eliminating its undergraduate public health degree, slashing teacher education and international studies programs, and reducing 143 courses — it cited financial necessity. What it did not publicise was that in the same period, it had paid a leadership coaching firm nearly $1.5 million.

That figure emerged from documents obtained by ABC's Four Corners under the Government Information (Public Access) Act — and it sits at the center of one of the most damaging exposés of Australian university management in recent memory. The program, aired April 9, 2026, is part of an ongoing investigation into how Australia's universities spent approximately $1.8 billion on external consultants in 2024 while simultaneously cutting thousands of academic and professional staff positions.

The Leadership Coach at the Center of the Story

According to The Australia Today and reporting by Campus Review, documents show UTS Vice-Chancellor Andrew Parfitt and his senior leadership team engaged Beyond Excellence, a coaching firm led by Julie Birtles. By 2025, UTS had paid Beyond Excellence a total of $1,487,461. About $783,000 of that spending occurred in 2024 — the same year planning for the university's workforce and course restructuring was actively underway.

The coaching program included leadership workshops, retreats, and confidential feedback sessions with senior staff. The university also funded travel for the consultant, including flights and accommodation for interstate visits.

The same year the final tranche of that coaching bill was paid, a motion of no-confidence in Vice-Chancellor Parfitt's leadership passed with the support of 95% of those who voted.

The Wider KPMG Involvement — and the Transparency Questions

Beyond Excellence was not the only outside firm working inside UTS during its restructuring. Four Corners also revealed that KPMG — one of the world's largest professional services firms — was deeply embedded in UTS's restructuring process. In May 2025, 24 KPMG staff had UTS email addresses, including three partners and two directors.

Former KPMG partner Brendon Lyon told Four Corners that this kind of integration is standard operating procedure for large consulting engagements. "Get into a client and look as much like you're part of the client as you can," he said. "That is the standard operating procedure."

Education Minister Jason Clare said taxpayers should be able to know what type of consultancy or contracting publicly funded universities are paying for. Senator Tony Sheldon, who initiated the first parliamentary inquiry into university governance, told Four Corners that consultants should have appropriate experience running education facilities — not just financial expertise. "Knowing about the money is important, but knowing about the reasons why you're there, is essential," he said.

What Is Being Cut at UTS — and Why

The UTS restructuring, initially announced in November 2024 and confirmed in February 2026, ultimately resulted in approximately 121 academic job cuts — about 10% of the academic workforce — on top of around 200 professional staff positions. The university will no longer offer its undergraduate public health degree and has cut teacher education and international studies courses, eliminating 143 courses and 839 subjects in total.

UTS says the restructuring is financially necessary. The university has been carrying recurring budget deficits, and the cuts are designed to produce a sustainable financial position and eventually a surplus. "You cannot spend more than you bring in," UTS Vice-Chancellor Carolyn Evans — whose institution is separate from UTS — said in the broader Four Corners program on the Australian university sector.

The National Tertiary Education Union has been scathing. NTEU general secretary Damien Cahill called the cuts "completely unnecessary" and blamed "widespread financial mismanagement." NSW NTEU division secretary Vince Caughley called the situation "another example of the governance failures and lack of accountability that have become entrenched in Australian universities."

Students have also spoken out forcefully. UTS Students' Association President Mia Campbell said: "There's a lot of outrage. Tutors say the bureaucracy just cares about money."

The Sector-Wide Picture: $1.8 Billion and Thousands of Jobs

UTS is not an outlier. It is one of at least 19 of Australia's 39 public universities to announce significant restructuring in 2025, with proposed job cuts nationally rising above 3,500. The Four Corners investigation — which also examined the Australian National University and the University of Wollongong — found that across the sector, more than $700 million is spent annually on consultants while thousands of academic positions are eliminated.

The ANU's own "Renew ANU" restructuring program is now winding down after cuts of approximately $250 million, while Western Sydney University is facing a projected deficit that ballooned from $6.5 million to $79 million by 2026, with plans to cut another 400 staff. The University of Canberra is targeting 200 jobs, and sector forecasts predict 2,400 job losses by 2027 across 15 institutions.

The root cause — as this publication documented in March — is structural: decades of declining public investment that left Australia's universities dependent on international student revenue, followed by a government policy of capping that revenue precisely when institutions could least afford it. The coaching contracts and consultant fees exposed by Four Corners are symptoms of a deeper problem: universities have adopted corporate management structures and corporate spending habits at a time of acute financial stress, without the corporate accountability that comes with private sector governance.

More than 306 executives at Australian universities earn above state premiers' salaries, according to union data. The contrast with the academic staff being made redundant — many of whom are casual or fixed-term employees with limited protections — has generated profound bitterness on campuses across the country.

What It Means for Students

For students currently enrolled at UTS and the other restructuring universities, the Four Corners report and the UTS coaching revelation matter in several direct ways.

Students who had planned to pursue programs that have since been cut — particularly in public health, international studies, education, and humanities — face disrupted pathways. UTS has committed that students currently enrolled in affected programs can complete their degrees. But students planning to enroll in those programs in future years will find them gone.

More broadly, the concentration of management spending on external consultants and executive coaching — at institutions simultaneously telling academic staff that jobs must be cut — raises serious questions about governance, values, and institutional priorities that go well beyond any individual expenditure.

The NSW government has launched an inquiry into the university sector; witnesses from EY, KordaMentha, and Macquarie University are scheduled to give evidence in Sydney. The NTEU has called for greater transparency and accountability from university management. And the Four Corners investigation is likely to intensify political pressure on the Albanese government to address the structural funding crisis that is driving these decisions in the first place.