Sunday, Apr 28 2024 | Updated at 10:43 PM EDT

Stay Connected With Us F T R

Dec 01, 2016 12:40 AM EST

Following the tirade against search engines and social networks for allowing the spread and proliferation of fake news, a report from the Stanford History Education Group (SHEG) revealed that most students are unable to reason with information they see online and judge if the resource is credible.

The report also showed that despite being technologically-savvy and adept, students have a hard time telling organic content from sponsored ones.

While Google and Facebook may have already began to take measures to ensure fake news don't get circulated and shared, SHEG began their research last January 2015.

SHEG scholars saw the importance of determining students' levels of "civic online reasoning" to identify skills to teach kids in distinguishing between reliable and unreliable sources of information online.

The research, funded by the Robert McCormick Foundation, was written by SHEG founder, Prof. Sam Wineberg and Director Joel Breakstone with researchers Sarah McGrew and Teresa Ortega.

The authors worked with teachers, university researchers, librarians and news experts to come up with age-appropriate tests for the young participants. These tests were given to schools from 12 states and 6 different universities.

Stanford researchers tested students from middle school, high school and college and these assessments covered news literacy and posts from social networks like Twitter and Facebook. They gathered 7,804 responses both from well-resourced and under-resourced schools in Los Angeles and Minneapolis.

They found that most middle school students cannot distinguish between sponsored content and real news stories. On the high school level a majority of the participants were unaware of the basic conventions that distinguishes verified sources of digital information.

The assessment for college students required more complex reasoning and results show that a credible-looking about page and links to reputable websites can easily get students to believing that the website is legitimate without paying close attention to the content.

Findings for this research will allow faculty and educators to assess student's skills and create tools and instruction media that will help equip young people and make them more discerning of the information they find online.

You can view the report's executive summary here.

See Now: Covert Team Inside Newsweek Revealed as Key Players in False Human Trafficking Lawsuit

Follows students, learning, Fake News, digital sources, verified content, Stanford SHEG, Stanford University
© 2024 University Herald, All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Must Read

Common Challenges for College Students: How to Overcome Them

Oct 17, 2022 PM EDTFor most people, college is a phenomenal experience. However, while higher education offers benefits, it can also come with a number of challenges to ...

Top 5 Best Resources for Math Students

Oct 17, 2022 AM EDTMath is a subject that needs to be tackled differently than any other class, so you'll need the right tools and resources to master it. So here are 5 ...

Why Taking a DNA Test is Vital Before Starting a Family

Oct 12, 2022 PM EDTIf you're considering starting a family, this is an exciting time! There are no doubt a million things running through your head right now, from ...

By Enabling The Use Of Second-Hand Technology, Alloallo Scutter It's Growth While Being Economically And Environmentally Friendly.

Oct 11, 2022 PM EDTBrands are being forced to prioritise customer lifetime value and foster brand loyalty as return on advertising investment plummets. Several brands, ...