In recent months, college campuses across the United States have become battlegrounds over protests related to the Israel-Hamas conflict. As student activists voice their support for either side, universities face mounting challenges in maintaining order while respecting free speech rights.

These tensions have escalated into a wave of protests, including building takeovers and student encampments, leading to confrontations with campus authorities. The result has been a flurry of legal actions, with both pro-Palestinian and Jewish students alleging that their rights were violated.

Legal Battles Over Free Speech and Discrimination

Pro-Palestinian protesters at several institutions, including Arizona State University and Indiana University, have filed lawsuits claiming that their First Amendment rights were infringed upon when they faced suspensions, expulsions, and arrests during peaceful demonstrations. These students argue that their universities' actions amounted to unlawful retaliation based on the political nature of their protests. For example, a lawsuit against Arizona State alleges that the university discriminated against pro-Palestinian protesters while ignoring other students who were not involved in the protests.

Conversely, Jewish students at universities such as UCLA, Northwestern, and Rutgers have taken legal action, arguing that their institutions failed to protect them from antisemitic harassment during the protests. These students claim that their universities did not adequately address incidents of intimidation and hate speech, thus breaching their contractual obligations to provide a safe and inclusive learning environment. The legal disputes highlight the complex balance universities must strike between upholding free speech and ensuring student safety.

READ MORE: UPenn Professors File Lawsuit Against University To Block Release Of Antisemitism Inquiry Documents 

Broader Implications for Higher Education Policies

The surge in litigation is not surprising to higher education and legal experts who have long anticipated these challenges. Peter Lake, a law professor at Stetson University College of Law, noted, "The thing a university does to protect a class of students is exactly the thing that's going to trigger a lawsuit that claims free speech rights have been violated." As universities navigate these legal battles, they also face scrutiny from lawmakers and donors, further complicating their response strategies.

The outcomes of these cases could have significant implications for university policies nationwide. Decisions in these lawsuits may provide clearer guidelines on how universities can balance free speech protections with their responsibility to prevent discrimination and harassment. In the meantime, institutions are under immense pressure to review and potentially revise their policies on protests and free speech.

Keith Whittington, a free speech expert at Princeton University, explained, "With many of these claims flying around, I think we're going to see exactly where higher ed landed in terms of its new relationship with speech and the protection of protected classes on campus." This evolving legal landscape will likely influence how universities handle future protests and demonstrations, especially those involving highly contentious issues.

Unionized Campus Workers Join the Fray

Adding another layer to the legal complexities, unionized campus workers have filed unfair labor practice charges against institutions like Harvard and Brown Universities. These complaints argue that crackdowns on pro-Palestinian protesters violated workers' rights to organize and participate in demonstrations. This intersection of labor rights and free speech issues is relatively new in the context of campus protests, signaling a broader trend of collective bargaining being used to address speech-related grievances.

In California, unionized academic workers within the University of California system have initiated rolling strikes in response to alleged unfair labor practices against members who supported pro-Palestinian protests. Neal Hutchens, a professor of educational policy at the University of Kentucky, observed that this situation might be one of the initial instances where issues beyond wages and benefits, specifically related to speech rights, are addressed within a collective bargaining agreement on campus.

As these legal battles unfold, the broader debate about free speech on campus and the rights of various student groups will continue to shape the policies and practices of higher education institutions. The fallout from these protests and subsequent litigation underscores the ongoing challenges universities face in fostering an environment that supports both free expression and student safety.

RELATED ARTICLE: North Dakota Attorney General Joins Multi-State Lawsuit Against Department Of Education Over Expanded Title IX