Monday, May 06 2024 | Updated at 06:07 PM EDT

Stay Connected With Us F T R

May 18, 2016 10:33 AM EDT

Things are not like it used to be as far as academic is concerned. For instance, those applying for research grant need to possess an imaginative "public engagement" plan - It's all about show nowadays.

This definitely seems to be a little distressing, especially considering those who are applying for the grant, haven't really done the work yet. In case, a research turn out to be disappointing, what options are available?

Clearly, those who can't guarantee a positive result, don't even get the grant. Amid all confusion, Friedrich Nietzsche seem to have the perfect idea.

Nietzsche's autobiographical Ecce Homo starts with the chapters that read, "Why I am so wise, Why I am so clever, and Why I write such good books." His academic career was almost over by then owing to illness. This marks his last notable publication before his tragic lapse into mental illness.

In his paper, Politics and Moral Character, renowned philosopher Bernard Williams indicated that the attributes that enable politicians to achieve success, might not necessarily be the qualities people seek in those we govern them. Lying, making misleading statements, not keeping promises, negligence of the interests of worthy person and complete attention to interests of unworthy persons are some of characteristics of politics nowadays.

Although, a close comparison of this can't be made with current academia, something needs to be said for the reverse argument.

That is, those displaying admirable academic characteristics such as support of their colleagues, caution, unwillingness to overstate, humility and regard to the achievement of others will find it comparatively harder to rise on top.

That said, even not aspiring to rise to the top is another admirable quality, so probably it works out for them.

As far as academic bragging contests are concerned, it seems to be an aspect of unintended outcome of a series of shots to defend universities against government cuts, Jonathan Wolff, professor of philosophy at University College London and dean of arts and humanities noted via TheGuardian.

However, ministers and civil servants do not trust anything without evidence, as they have learned from Williams as well as others that it is unethical to deflect public money to your ex-teachers, at least until the paperwork is in place. Wolff notes that there are hardly any evidences that universities actually make a difference.

He concludes noting that it is not totally wrong approach though, as no one undertakes research without actually hoping that it will make a difference. The university domain can proudly boast its collective achievements, however it would nice to eliminate some of the vanity, according to Wolff.

See Now: Covert Team Inside Newsweek Revealed as Key Players in False Human Trafficking Lawsuit

Follows universities, academic, Research Grant, education, Academic Education
© 2024 University Herald, All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Must Read

Common Challenges for College Students: How to Overcome Them

Oct 17, 2022 PM EDTFor most people, college is a phenomenal experience. However, while higher education offers benefits, it can also come with a number of challenges to ...

Top 5 Best Resources for Math Students

Oct 17, 2022 AM EDTMath is a subject that needs to be tackled differently than any other class, so you'll need the right tools and resources to master it. So here are 5 ...

Why Taking a DNA Test is Vital Before Starting a Family

Oct 12, 2022 PM EDTIf you're considering starting a family, this is an exciting time! There are no doubt a million things running through your head right now, from ...

By Enabling The Use Of Second-Hand Technology, Alloallo Scutter It's Growth While Being Economically And Environmentally Friendly.

Oct 11, 2022 PM EDTBrands are being forced to prioritise customer lifetime value and foster brand loyalty as return on advertising investment plummets. Several brands, ...