Saturday, Aug 18 2018 | Updated at 04:47 AM EDT

Stay Connected With Us F T R

May 01, 2017 09:23 AM EDT

A number of climate experts write a book chapter about treating human-induced climate change doubts as proofs of "real science". They stress the idea of basing such hypotheses on documented evidence rather than political agendas.

David Evans, per WND, is the executive director of the National Science Teachers Association. He has recently written a letter to his members insisting that they must teach the program of the National Wildlife Federation, the North America Association for Environmental Education, the Campaign for Environmental Literacy, the Center for Climate Change Communication, and other "activists groups". On the contrary, Evans clarified that they must avoid the information provided in the publication "Why Scientists Disagree About Climate Change."

Published by the Heartland Institute, the climate experts try to challenge current global warming arguments. For one thing, they believe that while the media and the research scene state that the Earth is too warm and humans are causing it, there is actually minimal-to-no evidence proving this claim. Clearly, the understanding of climate change is still impartial.

Watch video

Now, the critics want everyone to know that those who analyze the real situation must be treated as real scientists. They use scientific methods in proving or disproving the climate change claim. They did not just come up with an opposite idea in an instant, rather, they have conducted systematic assessments.

The focal point of the study is that there is still no formal agreement among scientists on the realness of global warming. Thus, educators do not know what to teach in schools. As a matter of fact, 31,000 scientists have signed a petition stating that there is "no convincing evidence" that humans affect the entire planet through releasing large amounts of carbon dioxide.

On the other hand, supporters of the human-induced climate change have long been dependent on the melting of ice in the Antarctic Peninsula. Unfortunately, the strongest proof of global warming is looking to be on the opposite side now. A study published in the journal "Science of the Total Environment" claims that the Antarctic Peninsula is "cooling" and that the previous warming is now "an extreme case".

Per The Blaze, the researchers added that the cooling that started in 1998 to 1999 is beginning to have significant impacts on the Antarctic's cryosphere. This means that "glacier recession" is now slowing down. A video from NASA explaining the link between climate change and the global oceans is shown below.

See Now: Facebook will use AI to detect users with suicidal thoughts and prevent suicide

Follows climate change doubts, climate change, global warming, proofs of global warming, signs of climate change, is climate change real, donald trump, ocean warming, earth, Heartland Institute, climate change activists
© 2017 University Herald, All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Must Read

Controlling Robots With Brainwaves And Hand Gestures

Jun 23, 2018 AM EDTWhat if you can control robots with a simple flick of a finger? A team of experts is trying to make that a reality through this latest experiment.

Flavored Electronic Cigarettes Linked To Possible Cardiovascular Disease

Jun 16, 2018 AM EDTScientists from the Boston University School of Medicine looked into the effects of flavored e-cigarettes to the lining of blood vessels. Here are ...

LendingTree Study: Which Places Have the Most Student Debt?

May 31, 2018 AM EDTLendingTree outs its study that identifies places in the United States with the most student debt. Here's the complete list.

Best College Reviews Names 10 Best Master's in Biomedical Engineering Programs Online

May 31, 2018 AM EDTPlanning to pursue a master's degree in Biomedical Engineering? Here are some of the best online programs you need to consider.