Sunday, May 05 2024 | Updated at 07:06 PM EDT

Stay Connected With Us F T R

Jul 08, 2014 01:54 PM EDT

People exposed to low levels of arsenic may significantly increase their chance of developing cancer, according to a recent study.

Researchers at the National Institutes of Health found that mice exposed to low doses of arsenic in drinking water, similar to what some people might consume, developed lung cancer.

Arsenic levels in public drinking water cannot exceed 10 parts per billion (ppb), which is the standard set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. However, there are no established standards for private wells, from which millions of people get their drinking water.

"This is the first study to show tumor development in animals exposed to very low levels of arsenic, levels similar to which humans might be exposed," Michael Waalkes, lead author on the paper and director of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Laboratory, said in a statement. "The results are unexpected and certainly give cause for concern."

For the study, the concentrations given to the mice in their drinking water were 50 ppb, 500 ppb, and 5,000 ppb. 50 ppb is the lowest concentration that has been tested in an animal study, and researchers say that because of differing rates of metabolism, mice need to be exposed to greater concentrations of arsenic in drinking water than humans to achieve the same biological dose and similar health effects.

In the study, the mice were given arsenic three weeks before breeding and throughout pregnancy and lactation. Arsenic was then given to the offspring after weaning, and all through adulthood at concentrations relevant to human exposure. The researchers looked at the tumors in the adult offspring.

Researchers found that more than half of the male offspring mice developed significant increases in benign and malignant lung tumors at the two lower doses.  Female offspring also developed benign tumors at the lower concentrations. Interestingly, the researchers did not find significant increases in lung tumors in either sex at the highest dose.

"Although this is only one study, it adds to a growing body of evidence showing adverse health effects from very low exposures to arsenic, raising the possibility that no level of arsenic appears to be safe," Linda Birnbaum, researcher and director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and NTP, said in a statement.

The findings were recently published in the Archives of Toxicology.

See Now: Covert Team Inside Newsweek Revealed as Key Players in False Human Trafficking Lawsuit

© 2024 University Herald, All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Must Read

Common Challenges for College Students: How to Overcome Them

Oct 17, 2022 PM EDTFor most people, college is a phenomenal experience. However, while higher education offers benefits, it can also come with a number of challenges to ...

Top 5 Best Resources for Math Students

Oct 17, 2022 AM EDTMath is a subject that needs to be tackled differently than any other class, so you'll need the right tools and resources to master it. So here are 5 ...

Why Taking a DNA Test is Vital Before Starting a Family

Oct 12, 2022 PM EDTIf you're considering starting a family, this is an exciting time! There are no doubt a million things running through your head right now, from ...

By Enabling The Use Of Second-Hand Technology, Alloallo Scutter It's Growth While Being Economically And Environmentally Friendly.

Oct 11, 2022 PM EDTBrands are being forced to prioritise customer lifetime value and foster brand loyalty as return on advertising investment plummets. Several brands, ...