Sunday, Feb 18 2018 | Updated at 03:03 PM EST

Stay Connected With Us F T R

Jan 31, 2017 12:09 PM EST

A study by Stanford and New York University may have found that, while fake news did get a lot of attention during the 2016 US presidential election, it did not help Donald Trump win. The impact of fake news on the election appears to have been greatly exaggerated.

Quartz reported that there are people who think that Hillary Clinton lost to Donald Trump because the latter was said to have had the power of fake news on his side. However, a study from economists at Stanford University and New York University has debunked that notion.

The study by New York University's Hunt Allcott and Stanford's Matthew Gentzkow found that fake news was "widely shared and tilted in favor of Donald Trump" but the readers' exposure and retention of the false stories may have been overstated. The researchers used web browsing data as well as survey responses and compared actual fake news in circulation to "placebo" stories that they invented.

It was revealed that Americans remembers 0.92 fake news that favored Donald Trump while remembered only 0.23 in favor of Hillary Clinton. A single false article would have needed the persuasive power of 36 television campaign ads to make an impact on the election.

It was also found that social media played a significant role as a source of news for the election. TV is still the most dominant source, though. Cable TV and network TV took the top two spots with 23.5 and 19.2 percent, respectively.

False stories that favored Trump were shared 30 million times on Facebook while stories favoring Clinton were shared eight million times. Speaking to Vox, Gentzkow confirmed that majority of fake news is produced and posted on small websites that "do not have a significant presence other than producing political stories that get shared on Facebook and other forms of social media."

The Stanford economist believed that there are a lot of pro-Trump stories because it may have been more successful in getting clicked on and generating ad revenue. Gentzkow admitted that it was not at all surprising since people liked to read about Donald Trump due to his controversial character.

Follows stanford, Stanford University, New York University, study, Fake News, donald trump, 2016 US Presidential Election, hillary clinton
© 2017 University Herald, All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Must Read

Here is NASA’s Take On Anonymous Hackers Alien Claims [VIDEO]

Jun 28, 2017 AM EDTNASA official says no alien has been found until today.

International Cyber Attack Strikes Again: Ransomware Hits Companies Worldwide [VIDEO]

Jun 28, 2017 AM EDTOver 2,000 computers in about a dozen countries were affected.

The Magic of Celebrity Involvement: How Projects and Concepts Get Public Nod When Icons Get Involved [VIDEO]

Jun 28, 2017 AM EDTDo celebrities really affect marketing?

Student Loans In Focus: How Much Do Students Really Borrow To Attend The Top 10 Schools [VIDEO]

Jun 26, 2017 AM EDTFor most students, going into the Top 10 schools is a dream come true. But is the expense in studying in these schools worth it?