Wednesday, Oct 18 2017 | Updated at 03:57 PM EDT

Stay Connected With Us F T R

May 01, 2017 09:23 AM EDT

A number of climate experts write a book chapter about treating human-induced climate change doubts as proofs of "real science". They stress the idea of basing such hypotheses on documented evidence rather than political agendas.

David Evans, per WND, is the executive director of the National Science Teachers Association. He has recently written a letter to his members insisting that they must teach the program of the National Wildlife Federation, the North America Association for Environmental Education, the Campaign for Environmental Literacy, the Center for Climate Change Communication, and other "activists groups". On the contrary, Evans clarified that they must avoid the information provided in the publication "Why Scientists Disagree About Climate Change."

Published by the Heartland Institute, the climate experts try to challenge current global warming arguments. For one thing, they believe that while the media and the research scene state that the Earth is too warm and humans are causing it, there is actually minimal-to-no evidence proving this claim. Clearly, the understanding of climate change is still impartial.

Now, the critics want everyone to know that those who analyze the real situation must be treated as real scientists. They use scientific methods in proving or disproving the climate change claim. They did not just come up with an opposite idea in an instant, rather, they have conducted systematic assessments.

The focal point of the study is that there is still no formal agreement among scientists on the realness of global warming. Thus, educators do not know what to teach in schools. As a matter of fact, 31,000 scientists have signed a petition stating that there is "no convincing evidence" that humans affect the entire planet through releasing large amounts of carbon dioxide.

On the other hand, supporters of the human-induced climate change have long been dependent on the melting of ice in the Antarctic Peninsula. Unfortunately, the strongest proof of global warming is looking to be on the opposite side now. A study published in the journal "Science of the Total Environment" claims that the Antarctic Peninsula is "cooling" and that the previous warming is now "an extreme case".

Per The Blaze, the researchers added that the cooling that started in 1998 to 1999 is beginning to have significant impacts on the Antarctic's cryosphere. This means that "glacier recession" is now slowing down. A video from NASA explaining the link between climate change and the global oceans is shown below.

Follows climate change doubts, climate change, global warming, proofs of global warming, signs of climate change, is climate change real, donald trump, ocean warming, earth, Heartland Institute, climate change activists
© 2017 University Herald, All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Must Read

Here is NASA’s Take On Anonymous Hackers Alien Claims [VIDEO]

Jun 28, 2017 AM EDTNASA official says no alien has been found until today.

International Cyber Attack Strikes Again: Ransomware Hits Companies Worldwide [VIDEO]

Jun 28, 2017 AM EDTOver 2,000 computers in about a dozen countries were affected.

The Magic of Celebrity Involvement: How Projects and Concepts Get Public Nod When Icons Get Involved [VIDEO]

Jun 28, 2017 AM EDTDo celebrities really affect marketing?

Student Loans In Focus: How Much Do Students Really Borrow To Attend The Top 10 Schools [VIDEO]

Jun 26, 2017 AM EDTFor most students, going into the Top 10 schools is a dream come true. But is the expense in studying in these schools worth it?